Lo studio: strumento per costruire la propria freedom, education
ingenuity and creativity to work, but especially
privileged opportunity to understand life.
Enrico Palandri
An error can occur.
A word that springs; emphasis forgotten a number misspelled. Nobody really pays attention. He squeezed his eyes, wrinkled her nose, a shrug and move on. Archived. Among the flavors a bit 'bitter a bit' funny. Among those thoughts to recall years later. Maybe in front of a pizza, with a few wrinkles that once did not know what they were, and a hoarse voice from smoking too many cigarettes.
memories, indeed.
there may be an error. Nobody is perfect, not even the computer (especially since we are typing). E 'already happened in the past. E. probably will happen again. Nothing shocking. Nothing abnormal.
But when the error is not simple oversight, the better one of those mistakes that you can easily define, without fear of exaggeration, "egregious"? We get angry, sure. You feel cheated.
But still you can accept. You can ... bear. That arises, there is a second chance to climb over the wall.
If, however, in the end, the sealed envelope, sealed , there is a sheet full of blunders, lack of distraction, anger does not even make sense. There is bitterness, disappointment, sconfroto.
Maturity 2008. Before
theme: Italian.
To break a little 'ice. Blame the Internet's popular prose, which has trumpeted Svevo and Pirandello after four years of poetry is not very useful. They are simple predictions. Have fun trying to guess. Like when you go to the racetrack and try to figure out which horse will cut the finish line first. You can not have bet anything, but you like to try the same. Like you turn on the adrenaline of the challenge.
Montale. Okay. You may go. Program last year, second time in five years (maturity 2004, including five in progress note), but Dante was repeated twice with an interval of one year. Yes, okay.
Poetry: from Ossi di sepia before harvest. Well what is, perhaps, is addressed more, gutted. Yet, it has proved a trap. A magnificent trap, perhaps unwittingly, that seems to be a joke if it were not tragic, shocking truth.
Leaving aside the regrettable error and blue pencil contained in the brief bibliography (Montale had an initial period influenced dall'ermetismo?), Poetry , in itself full of beautiful ideas, can be seen alongside a series questions of interpretation that is an understatement to say embarrassing. And the boys embark on fancy tests to identify elements that allow a glimpse of the ethereal, angelic women, support the thesis of salvation and consolation of evanescent figures that you see adjectives directed at male (always really whereas one can speak of consolation in the poetry of Ossi cuttlefish at least the same consolation which is reflected with the advent of women angel by Dante), chasing symbols and figures of which are called to search for the meaning.
What's wrong? But just in the questions asked. For the fact, obvious, given that the poem is one of the few, if not the only one that Montale dedicated to a man! But of course, dedication, always very present in the editions for specific desire of the author (K. A, the surname of Boris Kniaseff, Russian dancer met Montale and dedicatee of the poem), has been omitted for courtesy . Better to fly over the pitiful lack of respect for the text.
Nothing shocking, dramatic or ambiguous meanings that could be debated by the nose to some puritanical. Simply, Montale among the many images of his first poetic form that I could not take the ring , added, better recognized, the dance. And a dancer, the dedicatee of the poem exactly. Maybe you could talk about
salvation, but certainly not Clizia, foxes or other angelic women raging in the proposed text and their place consolation.
First mistake, then. Why define some mistake gaffe that an expert should know Montale average is an offense to the author.
And if that were not enough, just scroll down a little more 'securities to fall. Nothing so disastrous, this time, of course, but still a mistake. The Dying Gaul theme of literary art is a Roman copy of a Hellenistic original, probably bronze, not a Roman statue. Okay, a subtlety, a stickler. But not always required accuracy, attention to the boys?
Thursday, June 19 Second round: greek theme (I can talk about this for language)
Luciano. Code of Ethics for the historic , paragraph 41.
Start. Time: four hours.
And now is the first mistake: there are three words. Okay. Already happened (maturity 2004, was the version of Plato). Proceed. Other error: a " you" fell by the wayside. And spirits that do with witty antics annoying, popping accents e. .. It
continua.Totale: six errors identified (a seventh pass them over in silence, as deburring photocopy; also because un punto in alto, lì, proprio non avrebbe avuto senso).
Risultato? Ragazzi costretti a rendere e riprendere in mano la traduzione, e conseguente crisi da traduttore in una sede che non è proprio quella indicata per farsi cogliere da dubbi e problemi esistenziali sulla qualità della propria preparazione.
L'ispettrice è stata rimossa dal suo incarico; e il ministro dell'istruzione ha nominato il sostituto. un provvedimento che andava preso, ma che ha il sapore della classica toppa riparatrice. Per salvare, se non la dignità, almeno le apparenze.
Perchè su quelle prove, gli ispettori, ci dovrebbero lavorare da Gennaio. E se un pro quo here is passable, if you skipped a word or a spirit that has evaporated drawbacks are acceptable, there remains much to comment on similar falls. Especially in view of the fact that a school-leaving examination can not be improvised overnight.
And not because of the lean figure made by management, rather than by simple . Towards children who are facing the first real serious evidence of school life, to people who have felt five years for repeat rules, critical, precision and attention to exhortations, and find themselves deprived of the dignity of seriousness.
errors if they can do. If they continue to do. But these errors, concentrated in a single maturity, in such large numbers, leave much to think about.
the example that is given, that there is given.
Why will also nineteen facing those writings, but each year, in those four days, are we to repeat the maturity, re-examined in a test. More or less consciously. But if these are the results ... There is not anger or disappointment. Just a weary resignation.
______________________________
Forgive the outburst and the delay in doing so, but I decided just now. Last.
Why I did not want to believe it until the last. I could not believe it.
I apologize for reporting only, in the second round, the theme of greek, knowing by the news of the presence of other pearls in further tests. Failing, especially for English, the ability to directly verify, I leave to you the thought.
Why is it only what I wanted, I would like to propose. A reflection.
on what you ask, which is claimed, and how then, in a moment, one can feel cheated.
to your courtesy
0 comments:
Post a Comment