By next year are percent.
hundred years after first publication of "The manfesto futures, qulla set of rules create da Marinetti che sono andate a capovolgere una vestito un po' vecchio e con qualche logorio qua e là quale era la visione ingessata del mondo. Molte idee che se ne vanno a braccetto con l'amore per la velocità (embrione della lotta claviniana di Perseo e Gorgò?), la tecnologia (aerei e automoblili infestano pagine e pagine, quando sulle strade i mezzi di locomozione più diffusi sono ancora le gambe) e la violenza.
Eh, già: c'è anche la violenza. Non che l'uomo se la dimentichi da qualche parte, per carità. Se le prime saghe della storia (fino alle prime fiabe che si possono ricrodare) presentano elementi violenti un motivo ci deve pur essere. Forse una specie di recondita attrazione verso l'autodistruzione and put into play for themselves. Man seems the only animele dedicated to the destruction of their race, rather than conservation. With all due respect to Aristotle and his aphorism about human socevolezza . Probably here is the influence of Darwin. Because if the man is taken from the spiral of Darwin's natural selection can not fail.
Returning to the future, there is one thing . A "what " I studied in school, on the banks last year and that mildew in an idea faded in the head. Decomposes, it can be safely admitted. Because nobody cares, because of revolutions ce there have been many, throughout history. A more or less in the head does not change things. Perhaps because this did not go over a few years, and has left dead with blood and bits of flesh behind.
But this is a revolution.
how!
Who's the big deal?
If we fly over the massacre of the line, the systematic execution of the conjugation of verbs (delicious cross for students, and others), sull'incoronazione as emperor of the noun and his inseparable friend correlate analog, the deregistration of detailed points, commas, punctuation and amenities, has nothing.
If we fly over on this and other rules that have governed the literature for almost four years, obviously.
And then, perhaps, is not it better to stay a bit 'featured in this revolution?
Packages, billowing flags and inscriptions. All used. With rigor and measurement. But why?
Why an official text must be justified, a poem is like a sandwich sboconcellato (or rather a biscuit crumbs are those little words of modern poems that bounce off the order and send you into confusion metric) and a title should be impact camping, complete with tents and sleeping bags campfire in the center pages . Why is it so
.
Who decided? The Futurists certainly not. Abolished the segmented straight line continues justified and ordered them.
They said I have a sheet, a pen and my head. And I can start where I want scirvere. In the bottom right? It goes to the bottom right corner. And then jumping here and there. It makes apples a bit upset 'even the order: not only invented a new plot. You try to rewrite the story of Little Red Riding Hood (Little Red Riding Hood who knows?) from the end. O from the center. Or from the wolf. Here: starting from a poor, mistreated and that finishes wolf killed, gutted or impalliunato (dell'innoqua to face children's story) almost always. Does not change much in the end. The story is always the same.
But try putting the wolf first, then a basket. Add a few adjectives, blended with a hunter who appears before her grandmother and a wood that decorates the whole. At the bottom. So I guess the story is different .
short.
I think you could take back the future lessons. The first.
E iniziare a provare a scrivere senza badare tanto a dove poniamo la penna (o il cursore). A destra, se ci va. O a sinistra.
E mettiamo grassetti, corsivi, sottolineature e parentesi. Non servono solo in matematica, le parentesi. I greci le usavano per espungere i testi. Adesso si possono usare per molto altro.
Non voglio sobillare la scrittura accademica.
Ma almeno nella narrativa (anche se amatoriale) si potrebbe tentare.
0 comments:
Post a Comment